GENOCIDE??? More Likely LIES!

 

Below, I have shared a video that is so full of lies, I felt it needed to be addressed. It is from a little known podcast called “SGT Report”. After searching to learn more about it, I learned this podcast is ran by a few different people.  Apparently the video below is hosted by someone named Shawn, who seemed to mostly conceals his identity. I had to research to find out who he is, after hearing the guest call him only by his first name. I have to assume it is Shawn Ryan, a former Navy SEAL and CIA operative, that I learned periodically hosts the “SGT Report”.

In this video, he is interviewing a “whistle-blower” from the “Fast and Furious” debacle by the name of Jeffrey Prather. You remember “Fast and Furious” which took place in the Obama era when the government sold guns to Mexican cartels in hopes that they would later be tracked to high-ranking cartel members and assist in their captures…at least that’s the claim.

Now I didn’t follow Prather, or his whistle-blowing story; and for this post I didn’t take the time to research what, or why exactly he blew the whistle. He may have been right back then, but he most certainly is not right now. This video and this message is the only thing I want to address for now; because what he claims is actually very troubling...

I hate to even give any attention to this video, because in truth, it thus far doesn’t have that many views that we should worry. Furthermore, the pod-caster, as well as the guest, don't seem to be that well known. So why should we help them get more attention? But the truth of the matter, this narrative is exactly the same propaganda, more well known “influencers” like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, (as well as the left) are spewing, so I do feel it needs to be addressed. Lies won’t die with silence; they will spread. And both Carlson and Owens have a huge audience. While the accusations might not be exactly the same, this narrative is spreading like wildfire.

I won’t take time to address all of what Prather carries on about in this video. Instead, I will focus mostly on the Biblical and not delve into the political commentary and misstatements that he makes. It is muddled and confusing, as he states what he thinks will be viewed as “facts”, when it is really just old lying rhetoric from those that hate the government and fail to see any good in America. These things have been professed by a certain group for a very long time, without actual proof. The biggest one and most serious, in my view, is that Israel, and/or our government were the ones behind 9/11. The conspiracies are many with multiple levels; but they all carry pretty much the same message. I am not even going to attempt to refute the lying narratives. Just note, that I believe that one of these conspiracies was started by Alex Jones soon after 9/11 took place and while Jones was still a Democrat, if I have my timing correct. Just blame anyone other than a terrorist, seems to be their MO. In my opinion, Jones is a liar and will say anything in order to build an audience...including that Sandy Hook was fake. In the aftermath, he will go the direction the wind takes him. 

But for starters in this video, this guy, Jeffrey Prather, uses all the lingo of the left, instead of the preferred, conservative language. For example: He uses “Palestine” as opposed to Gaza; “Wailing Wall” a derogatory term, as opposed to the “Western Wall”. And “West Bank” the media preferred term instead of the Israeli truth – Judea and Samaria. Basically in my opinion, the language he uses should tell us everything we need to know about Jeffrey Prather - he hates Israel.  

Prather’s religious beliefs are apparently the inaccurate, even heretical belief of "Replacement Theology" or "Supersessionism". Instead, he tells us the long held Christian belief of dispensationalism is what is heresy. Nope! What he calls heresy, is actually Biblical. What he is spewing is heresy. For those unaware, “Replacement Theology” is the belief that the church has replaced Israel in all the promises given from God. I don't fault him for having the faith beliefs he holds, but I am just not certain it's as much about faith, as it is a means to deride Israel.

As the foundation of his narrative, Prather takes the "Parable of the Vineyard" out of context (without giving chapter and verse, I might add) and ignores Romans 11 where Paul assures us that God's covenants are forever! The Church has not replaced Israel, but we (the Church) are to provoke the Jew to jealousy, so that they will one day know Jesus is the Messiah they have been awaiting. In 11:1-2 Paul says: "Hath God cast away his people? I say, God forbid." You can take that to the bank! Prather thinks we won’t research any of that. Either he doesn’t know chapter and verse, or he doesn’t want us to read it for ourselves and know the truth of what it really means.

Then Prather tries to say that “Dispensationalism” has only been around since the Scofield Bible was published in 1909, which is a lie often repeated by Supersessionists. Darby lived in the 1800’s and Supersessionists love to tell us that no one believed in the dispensations until Darby came on the scene promoting what is “error”, in their view. And thereafter, C. I. Scofield with his Scofield edition of the Bible promoted Darby’s beliefs. But theologians much older than those two, believed in Dispensationalism. Dispensationalism is merely the belief that God deals with us through the generations and dispensations. Sadly, Supersessionists can some how get Israel removed from any prevalence in history, by denying the dispensations.

Here is an AI Overview of Dispensationalism. It is mostly correct, save the remark that God relates to humanity differently through time. I am not sure saying God deals with us differently is accurate. Dispensationalists believe God is the same yesterday, today and forever...which is Scripture – Hebrews 13:8. In any case, how He deals with us, is not as important as the fact that we are in the Church age – the age of Grace. Here is the AI version, which is actually a very good definition:

Dispensationalism is a Protestant theological system that interprets [B]iblical history as a series of distinct periods, or "dispensations," during which God relates to humanity differently. Key features include a literal interpretation of the Bible, a firm distinction between Israel and the Church, and a belief in separate divine plans and destinies for each. It is most prominent in American Evangelicalism and emphasizes a future earthly kingdom for ethnic Israel. 

Even well-known preacher J. C. Ryle (1860 -1900) talked about Israel as God’s chosen people. And though today they call him a “Calvinist”, he is actually not a Calvinist by how we define them today. Ryle certainly didn’t preach what has come to be known in many circles as “cheap grace”.

Also, as far back as the late 1600’s – early 1700’s, well-known theologian, Matthew Henry held to the fact that Jews are God’s chosen people. He said this about Israel:

“The covenant God made with Abraham, was not done away by the giving the law to Moses. The covenant was made with Abraham and his Seed. It is still in force; Christ abideth for ever in his person, and in his spiritual seed, those who are his by faith.”

Matthew Henry believed Israel’s rejection was not final, expecting a future conversion of the Jews, which that is what is Biblical. He saw Israel as a covenant people and the church as continuity with Israel. We are grafted into Israel; not the other way around.

So the fact that dispensationalism didn’t begin until Darby, Scofield and the Scofield Bible is flat-out wrong, believed by those who adhere to Replacement Theology – that the Church replaced Israel. The Bible in correct context and with full counsel teaches dispensationalism. Why do they continue to repeat the church replaced Israel when it is so easily refuted. In Romans 11:25, Paul informs us:

For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

My goodness, how much more plain can it get?! If God is not going to keep covenant with the Jews, how can we believe he will keep His promises to us?

One can't just repeat the belief that people propagate in order to disprove dispensationalism i.e. that it “started with John Nelson Darby and then backed up by C. I. Scofield”. They are just repeating the argument – circular reasoning. That does not provide proof that dispensationalism didn’t exist before their writings. The truth is, many theologians like Matthew Henry, in the late 1600's, believed in dispensationalism. So no, it didn't start with Darby in the 19th century.

Jeffrey Prather tries to tell us the Jews lost their standing because the Jews killed Jesus! For one, this totally ignores the message of the Gospel...that Jesus willingly laid down His life for us; and that it was all God’s plan!!! But even aside from that, historically and Biblically we all know it was the Romans that were in charge and killed Jesus. Though some Jews of the time pressured Pilate to take the life of Jesus, it was the Roman soldiers and Pilate that carried out the act. Why don’t they ever mention that??? The truth is according to the Bible and everything we need to know: every. single. one. of. us! nailed Jesus to the cross because of our sin. And He died for each of us...including the Jew. What kind of pastor (I think he claims to be) is Prather to not even mention that?!!!

Early on, they tell us they have better soundbites to demonstrate what they want us to believe. Oh, really? Then why didn’t they use them. I think they probably didn’t use them, because they don’t really have them! They use something obscure, thinking we won’t see through it and instead just believe them in what they are trying to impart. No, thank you. There is no clarity in anything they tried to convince us to believe. A lot of it is simply regurgitated conspiracy theories decades old, that have never been proven as fact. They tell us that Israel is escalating the violence in order to bring about a larger, greater Israel. The truth is, PM Netanyahu has said multiple times they do not want to control Gaza. They just want it free of Hamas.

Prather uses a video from accused, anti-Semite, Piers Morgan with a virulent guest by the name of Gideon Levi to convince us of his stance. He uses a false premise to get us to believe the foundation he wants to set. Levi spews venom when he states we should not be concerned with 20 Israeli hostages, when “Israeli’s are killing 20 people every 6 minutes/6 hours” since October 7th. Methinks that is probably the stats of Hamas and not at all real.

As well, they claim that 9/11 was to prepare us for this very moment at the behest of Bibi Netanyahu… Come on!! Prather almost tries to convince us that Netanyahu is the anti-Christ. But the anti-Christ is NOT a Jew. The anti-Christ comes out of Rome, with the False Prophet (a religious figure, not a politician) being a Jew. As well, it seems, as I said earlier, the 9/11 Truther lie was started by Alex Jones; at least he takes claim for it. I researched it when it first happened, because I started seeing signs around our cities that claimed “America was behind 9/11” and “Bush knew”. Right. Let’s just take the blame entirely off of the terrorists and blame America. (Please note sarcasm!)

These guys repeat the lie of those who hate Israel which is that the IDF had a part in the attack from Hamas, and that “Netanyahu knew” (same as “Bush knew”, I guess. Same rhetoric, new game.) But that Bibi knew of this plan has already been refuted many times! The truth is, there was a mistake that was made in Israel allowing Gazans to come across the border on “work releases”. This out of the goodness of Israel’s heart and believing Gazans could be trusted. Yes, I said Gazans, not just Hamas. Instead, they were plotting and planning the attack. The border was NOT as secure as Prather claims. And Israel found out they can not trust Gazans.

 They want us to believe there was a stand down order and a cover up for what really happened on 10/7/23. This is the lie that was disseminated by people like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, who it seems have been after Israel since the attack on Israel. And by the way, Charlie Kirk even got in on the Bibi knew narrative in the beginning. He has since been trying to make amends by trying to convince us he loves Israel. The way I see it, Tucker was simply a coward about the lie and let his many guests state the propaganda first. Apparently, he finally felt he was in a position to join them with more than just a silent nod of the head.

More lies disseminated are the decades old trope that “AIPAC is buying Congress”, when in fact, AIPAC only contributes 5% of PAC funds! And within the other 95% are also funds from Muslim nations and Muslim entities along with a host of others, of course. But anyone can see 5% is not going to have that much influence. The real influence, in fact, comes from a Christian belief (and this is the group they know they have to cater to, because we vote!!) that we are to support Israel. And this was a belief Congress adhered to long before Israel was reborn a nation in 1948.

Prather repeats the well-known lie that at least half of Congress has duel citizenship with Israel, which of course is absolutely ridiculous! It has been verified from other sources that there are very few members with dual citizenship in this Congress. 

Prather and/or the podcast according to the "SGT Report" website has ties to Clay Clark (Thrive Time) who along with Mikki Willis and his movie making organization “Elevate” were behind the ridiculous scare tactics regarding the COVID vaccine being snake venom and all the crazy videos that were going on when we were all isolated with not much to do. They took advantage of that by producing lies and fear-mongering at a time many Americans were very afraid of that virus.

In this interview, they quote Michael Flynn, but honestly Flynn has direct ties to QAnon and President Trump quit associating with him for some reason...though he didn’t state why publicly; out of respect, I believe, for those who support him and for Flynn’s position in the military. I know Flynn is right about some things, but I feel like I do not trust him due to the time QAnon was spreading their Q drops. He had their logo on his media page. Flynn’s opinion matters little to me.

Finally, they are regurgitating Hamas’s false statistics regarding deaths, even saying Israel is committing genocide. That has been proven categorically false, which is why the media is now mostly silent on the issue, instead of blasting it from the airwaves as they did initially.

We are told in Scripture that there will be scoffers in the end times, and we are most certainly seeing that in regard to the nation of Israel. In fact, the nation of Israel is the only reason this argument over dispensationalism has risen its ugly head, these days. Over and over and over, everybody's talking about it. The fact is, the goal is to turn America against Israel. There biggest job is to target and change the minds of Christians, because we have long held the belief that we are to support Israel. In order to get us to turn against Israel, the contrarians need to deny dispensationalism and prove it false. And that's the only reason that this topic is at the forefront so often today.

And because Darby and Scofield *did* promote dispensationalism, it gives people a reason to say that that's when it started. But that is not when it started. It's been a belief from the beginning of Christianity. It is written in the Word of God. And a thorough study, within context, reveals that. We wouldn't even be talking about it, today, if it wasn't for the turn we are seeing politically against Israel.

Everything Jesus said in the New Testament was spoken to the Jews. It is for us in future, of course, too. But it was the Jew that preserved the Scriptures for us. When Jesus lived, there was no such thing as Christianity. That came after His death. The church came to fruition in Acts 2. Before that, Jesus was speaking to the Jew, in the very land God gave to Abraham and his seed.

In Luke 21:24, Jesus foretold that the Jewish people would be led captive, and Jerusalem would be "trodden down" by Gentiles until the “times of the Gentiles are fulfilled," That demonstrates a time that will come to an end, (the Church age) and His attention will be on the Jew once again. In complete context of scripture, and the full counsel of the Word of God, it shows He is telling us of Israel's place in future events and He wanted us to know and understand that.

Jesus also spoke of a future Messianic kingdom in the land of Israel. There really is no reason for the Bible to tell us Jesus is of the line of David if it wasn't to bring the Jew in to His Kingdom – it would be a fulfillment of prophecy that they understood; the Messiah they were long awaiting needs to be a Jew. In other words why does the Bible place such importance on the fact that Jesus is from the Davidic line if God's just going to do away with Israel? That Jesus was from the line of David; the tribe of Judah is expressly written for the Jew – indeed for the time that they will receive Him as their Messiah. If it was only about us, the Christian, we wouldn't even need to know that Jesus is a Jewish Savior. So no, God is most certainly not done with Israel.

Jesus also wept over Jerusalem out of His great love for them. The importance of Israel and the Jews is written throughout the New Testament as well as the Old Testament. It has to be that way.

Israel is our time clock, it's a witnessing tool to bring people into the Kingdom by enabling us to see prophecy. Israel is once again a nation to let us know the end is near, exactly as the Bible tells us. And it's also the land where Jesus returns. So yes it matters. Every word of the Bible points to Jesus and Israel is a part of bringing about that understanding we all need to know. He will return there just as He said.

"There will be scoffers in the last days." "Every Nation will turn against Israel." That's what we're seeing. And this current argument about dispensationalism is only helping those that hate Israel. They are repeating the inaccurate belief that requires an allegorical belief of Scripture as opposed to literal. The naysayers want us to believe that dispensationalism only began with Darby...because that deception is important to make Israel and the Jew inconsequential. It simply isn't accurate and it is dangerous.

We are in the church age, the dispensation of grace where Romans 11:25-27 specifically applies:

“For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins”

Romans 11:29 states: “for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable.” Paul reassures believers that despite the unfaithfulness of the Jew, God's promises to the Jewish people will not be undone. This verse demonstrates God's grace and faithfulness are without change. It demonstrates that His chosen people and their blessings are secure. That assures Christians that we can count on His promises too.

Irrevocable means irrevocable. Do we want Him to break His promise to us? If we worship a promise breaker, then there isn't a whole lot to count on, is there?

"I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew." Romans 11: 1-2

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DFplTFp1hCIz

"Kooky 'Naughty' Carlson"

This is an opinion piece based on my own research and my religious and political beliefs. I am not claiming I have any answers. I have questions like everyone else. I'm just sick of other people stating their opinions as fact without any proof, whatsoever.

The video clip above is Tucker Carlson's entire speech which he just recently gave at Turning Point, USA. I want to share the entire speech; but for reference, the part which I am addressing in this post, begins at the 5:04 minute mark and ends at the 17:00 minute mark. It is Tucker's views, stated as facts claiming Israel is to blame for Epstein Island...at least that is how I interpret it.

Actually, you could listen to the first 5 minutes, because he jumps into the Epstein issue right away, but if you are like me, it will infuriate you. And I would like to save you time...and grief!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My View of Tucker's Speech (short version)    

That wasn't a speech, it was a rant; and an unhinged one at that. He starts with trying to make the case that Israel/Mossad is behind Jeffrey Epstein and he ends with what he is really upset about and the narrative he has been pushing since 10/7/23. And that is, "the war Israel is going to get us into”. I think in Tucker's long-held frustration, which he vented on this platform, he revealed his real fear and anger. "Israel's War".   

Before what has become known as "The 12 Day War", Tucker boldly and confidently told us if Trump flew jets into Iran to take out the uranium bunkers there, it was going to get us into WWIII. He told us tens of thousands of our troops would be killed. Well, of course that didn’t happen. And the statement that we would send tens of thousands of our troops, was NEVER going to happen! Because Israel has NEVER asked for them, and President Trump has promised they would never be sent! That was fear-mongering on Tucker’s part. Rabid fear-mongering, in my view.

Then in his speech at TPUSA, Tucker also gets to the point regarding accusations made about him accepting money from Qatar.* He tries to clarify to us what he believes to be the foolishness of that accusation, without naming himself. But it has been reported, there is actually more evidence for him accepting Qatari funds, than there is any evidence Israel was involved with Epstein. Many claim his ties to Qatar have been documented. I haven’t researched that. But I did research the claim that he took 15 million from American Muslim Omeed Malik to start his business.** And that is fact. Malik is a former Democrat supposedly turned libertarian. There are good arguments on both sides as to whether Malik is a dangerous man or not. I think the proof is in the pudding with how Tucker seemingly so drastically changed at the onset of his podcast platform, TCN, after accepting those funds. Coincidental?

As far as Israel's involvement at Epstein Island, I don’t believe it for a minute. I view the accusation as coming from those who hate Israel and/or are being paid by entities such as Qatar...maybe even Iran.

Here are some facts:

1. Naftali Bennett, Former Prime Minister of Israel of the New Right Party wrote a beautiful letter clarifying exactly how Israel has never been involved with Epstein. He is not from the government of Bibi Netanyahu, who is of the Likud Party...comparable to President Trump and the Republican party. So I don’t know why in the world TC and Charlie Kirk, for another, seem to hate Netanyahu so badly. I suspect Carlson's reasons are different than Charlie’s and Charlie has just bought into Carlson’s accusations without fully understanding. I could go off on Charlie, too. I think he has responsibility as a Christian and someone who claims to stand with Israel to call Tucker out on his statements. Instead, he platformed, teaching thousands of young people an anti-Israel narrative. That's dangerous. 

2. Much ado has been made of the fact that Tucker invited PM Netanyahu on his show and the Prime Minister has not accepted or even acknowledged the invite. But if you were the conservative PM of the nation Carlson appears to hate would you go? 

Carlson has interviewed and given a platform to a number of people that hate Israel to one degree or another: anti-Semites, anti-Zionists (same thing) and/or flat out holocaust deniers. I won't say who I think is in which group, but let me give you a few names: Candace Owens, Glenn Greenwald, Ian Carrol, Alex Jones, Col Doug Macgregor, Munther Isaac, Dave Smith, Tate Brothers, Hodge Twins, Darry Cooper, Doug Wilson... The President of Iran???

Honestly, it seems like he has interviewed every Israel hater that has any kind of profile and influence at all. And yet I can think of only one pro-Israel person Tucker has interviewed and that is Ted Cruz. And actually that felt like a set-up. Cruz was obviously unprepared and probably put to much confidence in his well-acclaimed debate skills. Still he made some important points, that Carlson mocked.

3. Just because it is likely former Prime Minister Ehud Barak (Israel Democrat Party, same as US liberal Democrats) visited Epstein Island does not mean Israel had any ties to Epstein. That would be like saying America is responsible for Epstein Island because Bill Clinton had ties with him and was a number one guest there, and in a blue dress no less. I simply don't believe that America has responsibility for Bill Clinton's own actions. Let's put the blame where it lies...with the person participating. At the very least don't blame America, single out the party leadership! 

By the way, the Labor Party is also a liberal party supported by unions in Israel. There are multiple political parties in Israel. If you follow Israeli politics almost everything that happens in Israel is identical to what is happening in America. From Conservative and Liberal parties, to Iran trying to take the lives of both of those great conservative leaders!! 

4. Just because Epstein is Jewish does not mean he had ties to Israel. Many American Jews are so liberal they constantly fight against Israel and seem to actually hate that tiny nation. Politicians have pondered this fact for decades, wanting to bring them to the conservative side.

5. There is actually proof that during the Obama years, Epstein money, along with tax payer dollars was funneled into NGO’s in Israel with the goal to overthrow Bibi Netanyahu and replace him with Ehud Barak. But that does NOT implicate Israel or Mossad. This was done in order to enable the JCPOA (Iran Nuclear Deal) to go through, which it did. That points to crooked regimes within a nation and the nation, itself should NOT be blamed. That makes me wonder even more why Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk hate Netanyahu!  Trump ended the JCPOA in his first administration with profuse thanks from Bibi Netanyahu. They are NOT the bad guys!!! Yet, both Carlson and Kirk have spoke out against Netanyahu and Likud. (The conservatives! SMH)

6. Contrary to Carlson's claim, everyone in Washington doesn't believe what Tucker believes, and sides with him – no matter how many times he says it, or how passionately it is stated. That's just more hyperbole from him. There are plenty of amazing Israel supporters in Congress. In the Senate: Markwayne Mullin, Tom Cotton, Elise Stefanik, Ted Cruz... and in the House: Brian Mast is amazing! Just to name a few. And in Trump's Cabinet: Kristi Noem, Mike Huckabee, Lee Zeldin, Stephen Miller, Pete Hegseth, and Marco Rubio are amazingly supportive and knowledgeable. I could probably go on with more.

The left and the neo-Nazi right, (yes, that is the name I decided to call some of them. Sorry, not sorry.) love to claim AIPAC is buying our members. This is a huge laugh when one considers AIPAC accounts for about 1% of PAC dollars, while Muslim PACs are up to roughly 5%. And yet this claim rages! Looking for those charts and stats, as I have seen them, but man our search engines and social media like to bury that stuff. I will include them when I find them again.

By the way, despite many claims throughout social media, there are NO dual citizenship member in Congress. None, zero, nada, zip. And yet that rumor is repeated over and over and over. That is not to say there aren't America haters there...Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib come to mind...in my view.

But let's get back to the innocence of Israel, Obama's JCPOA, and where the blame seems to lie. There is information that points to the fact that the Clinton's and their network stood to gain both financially and geopolitically from the JCPOA . That doesn’t mean Israel or America was involved. Crooked people were! And that does not implicate Israel; but rather, Iran is the one that benefited from the JCPOA...just sayin’!

So why is Tucker blaming Israel? Probably because he is too busy giving softball interviews to Vladimir Putin who has it out for Israel (and that attack will come to fruition one day – not necessarily under Putin. But that’s Biblical prophecy!) Tucker has also been busy interviewing Revisionist historian, Darryl Cooper (MartyrMade) who thinks Churchill was the bad guy! And then interviewing the President of Iran allowing him to speak the entire time without question or rebuttal. Interestingly, the Iranian President used ALL the talking points Tucker has been dishing out to us the last few years. It was as if Tucker wrote the script!

Why isn’t Carlson blaming Iran instead of Israel? The evidence is there in regard to who is really to blame. Think about it. If I know this stuff, TC most certainly knows it. But I am not getting paid any money. ;-) He has some of the premise correct...like how far this goes back, etc. But why he turns it all on Israel, is just mind boggling. He misses pointing out the real villains – probably Iran and Obama...and mostly, Jeffrey Epstein. It's almost like he is giving that evil man an excuse!

I don't care how many times one claims they love Israel. If Israel is always their primary target in their narratives, all without facts or proof, they do NOT love Israel. That's Tucker's MO. e.g. Paraphrase - "Oh I love Israel, I had an amazing time there, but...." 

He's a coward. He should just say he hates Israel. That aligns more closely with his actions.

Carlson is constantly whining that people are shaming him/us and trying to silence anyone from criticizing Israel. He says people like me and/or Zionists believe no one has the right to criticize the Israeli government. That is patently false and he knows it! Israel has a left and right government just like ours, only with a few more parties. Of course we criticize the government! He creates a false narrative to try to turn us against Israel. But why in the world he criticizes the conservative wing of the government, I will NEVER understand...unless that's really his choice of administration. Think about it; he apparently wants Israel to fail. He mocks the fact that Iran is the greatest funder of terrorism in the Middle East. Uh...maybe he should do a bit of research on the 7 front war, Israel is enduring. All financed by Iran. Actually 8...his group being the 8th enemy, IMO. All of those 7 fronts are financed by Iran? hmmm...Number 8? 🤔

Further, he is conflating issues when he brings up the drug epidemic in America. Yes, that's a problem. But Trump is helping fix it by closing the border. But kids dying from drug overdoses, doesn't negate the fact that we have a problem with Iran. Good grief! How stupid does he think we are. If he thinks that's an effective argument, he is the stupid one. It's conflating issues!

And then, as is his norm, Tucker always seems to be able to bring God into his speech...in this case his rant. Sorry. I don't buy Tucker's claim of faith. I don't for one minute think it is real. That is not judging. That is not contrary to the statement that "only God knows his heart." That is an observation and a view of discernment. "By their fruits, you will know them." I see no evidence of God in Tucker's life, other than he likes to use His name when he needs it. His actions reveal something entirely different.

And then finally, at the end of this segment that I have highlighted, when Tucker mentions someone taking money from an evil nation, someone yells out "Qatar". And what does he do? He laughs his wicked laugh and mocks the comment. But that isn't funny. It is a well known fact that Qatar is invading our colleges and other organizations and even government entities with their money. Yet, Carlson laughs. Methinks he protests too much.

We should trust Trump. That’s why we elected him. He knows when, where and what if any files should be released. Without all the information that Trump has we certainly don’t know; and Tucker Carlson certainly doesn’t know either! He has become an unhinged lunatic, in my view. Or just “Kooky Carlson", if you prefer.

If you want to research some of this further, Insurrection Barbie @defiyantlyfree on X, has an amazing thread today. She has spent hours and days researching...not using AI. She is a Christian, 100% pro-Trump, pro-Israel and pro-America...and she is not a Carlson supporter! Kinda like me, ;-) only she is way smarter!! She doesn’t buy into anything without researching. I have often wondered who she is, because her knowledge and wisdom are absolutely astounding on every issue. I am not saying she is infallible, but I will trust her, until I hear a little noisy buzzer going off in my head screaming FALSE. So far what she says rings true.

I also recommend watching this interview and reading her comment. 

From Insurrection Barbie regarding Alan Dershowitz's view:

"This is totally accurate:

“I will say this on Epstein. If you want to go dedicate 40 hours of your life researching, you will walk away understanding that no one is covering up for child r*pists. Furthermore the age of the girls involved had always been 15 and up.

Rich influential men did depraved things and got a pass because they had money and power and status.” [Bold emphasis, mine]

That short video clip is very informational. I believe most of it. I am not sure, I believe the suicide part. I do want to believe Dan Bongino, and this video is very convincing. 8min 43secs long.  This is what I believe. And I am sorry it is coming from Democrats. But most conservative Christians believe this too. That ain't Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens! I do not believe the conspiracy theories Tucker and others want us to believe. I don’t believe Epstein was a CIA operative or a pawn of Mossad. I believe it was evil men from various places. To say it was America or Israel or DJT is disgusting and dangerous. And it’s dividing our party! Maybe that is what Tucker wants. To me, he seems obsessed with destroying us and Israel...all while professing his love.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*Tucker is denying receiving any money from Qatar. But I believe Mark Levin has done the research. He doesn’t call him “Chatsworth (Rush’s nickname) Qatarlson” for nothing.

** Tucker did pay back Omeed Malik the 15 million in June of 2025.

Oh, Tucker

 

Because of a recent guest on Tucker Carlson’s podcast and his promotion of this guest, (March 31, 2025) the controversy over Dispensationalism verses Replacement Theology is heating up again on social media. “Replacement Theology” is the belief that the church has replaced Israel (and/or the Jewish people) as the focus in Scripture. It basically negates the importance of Israel, as a people and a nation. Replacement Theology means exactly how it sounds. It redefines to whom God’s Covenant was given as God’s Chosen People. Replacement Theology, also known as “Dominionism” and “Supersessionism” (meaning the church has superseded Israel as God‘s chosen people) is in opposition to “dispensationalism” which is my view and the more common, traditional, Christian view. 

“Dispensationalism” is an evangelical view that interprets Biblical history as a series of distinct eras or "dispensations" where God interacts with humanity in different ways. It emphasizes the distinction between Israel and the Church, believing the Jew to be God’s chosen people to fulfill His Divine plan, and it explains the need for both. This is based on Genesis 12: 1-3, the Abrahamic Covenant, – the promise God made to Abraham.   

12 Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee: 2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: 3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

Let’s more clearly define that, too. This was a divine agreement made between God and Abraham, promising him a great nation, land, and blessings for all nations through his descendants.

• Verse 1: God commands Abraham to leave his homeland (Mesopotamia) and go to the land God will show him – Canaan, the Promised Land to become Israel.

• Verse 2: God promises to make Abraham a great nation, bless him, and make his name great.

• Verse 3: God promises that all peoples on earth will be blessed through Abraham.

And with that covenant the Jews made a sign: Circumcision was established as the sign of the covenant between God and Abraham and his descendants in Genesis 17: 9-14.

So with that ground work laid, let’s get back to today and the podcast that caused me to write: Tucker Carlson’s March 31, 2025 interview with Andrew Isker. Isker is the pastor of 4th Street Evangelical Church in Waseca, MN. Interestingly, Isker also has connections and studied under Pastor Doug Wilson, at Greyfriars Hall Ministerial Training School in Moscow, ID. This school was started by Wilson’s “Christ Church” in Moscow. Wilson is a Senior Fellow of Theology at the school. He is a Reformed Calvinist and is one of the pastors, whom Tucker has recently interviewed, promoting “Covenant Theology” and/or “Replacement Theology”. Covenant Theology is a little softer than Replacement Theology, by saying that the church has not replaced Israel, but has fulfilled God’s promise whom He had made to Israel. In my view, Covenant Theology is one and the same as Replacement Theology and the terms are interchangeable, because they both negate Israel. Covenant Theology teaches that the existence of Israel today is not prophetically significant. This is why I assume Tucker found this pastor and interviewed him. He supports Tucker’s political agenda, as does anyone who won’t support Israel.

Many of Tucker’s guests since leaving Fox News have been very anti-Israel, and this guest was not an exception. Tucker is obsessed with the United States support of Israel. He hates it. He doesn’t like money going to them and he does not want to be seen defending them in any way. He pretends he has the same views as President Trump, or rather that President Trump’s are the same as his; but they are far different when it comes to foreign policy. And personally, I see all of Tucker’s anti-Israel guests as a means to undermine Trump’s views and policy. TC is trying to bring us along to his view. I have yet to seen him interview a guest from the other side. I think he believes when he gets to us, he can influence Trump.

I don’t like talking or arguing Scripture or someone’s beliefs, but Tucker is a political pundit that continually weighs into faith doctrines that are controversial and he is teaching them as fact. This, without us even knowing for sure that he is a Christian. I think it needs to be addressed. I respect everyone’s difference in beliefs, when I know it is truly about their faith and not their politics. Or even if they buffer their politics with their faith beliefs. But not when the two are clearly in opposition, or faith is being used, distorted, or manipulated. Below is a list of Tucker’s guests that have brought me concern. All of these people have been reported to be anti-Semites in one form or another and/or anti-Israel. I don’t think that’s coincidental. Where is the other side if it’s about fairness? Here they are:

Jimmy Dore, Candace Owens, Colonel Doug Macgregor, Glenn Greenwald, Thomas Massie, Darryl Cooper, (MartyrMade), Alex Jones, Ian Carrol, Russel Brand, Julian Assange, Doug Wilson, Jackson Hinkle, Palestinian pastor Munther Isaac to name a few. I think he has also supported the Tate brothers; I know that Candace Owens has. He always downplays it after the interview, if criticism comes, saying he's just supporting free speech. But it's more than that; he's consistently promoting a belief and an agenda. Do you think all of those interviews are coincidental, when the other side is completely missing?

And now, most recently, he has interviewed Andrew Isker, a Replacement Theology advocate and a teacher of this doctrine. This is the interview that blew up everything on Facebook and X. It has caused me to want to address the inaccurate doctrine of Replacement Theology. Dispensenationalism, in contrast to Replacement Theology, has been discussed and argued for forever - by the best of theologians! So I don’t expect to match that and I certainly don’t expect to change anyone’s ideas or faith. But I have to try to explain some things anyway, from merely a layman’s perspective. I want to address it not so much in regard to the difference in faith doctrines, which I believe we are not to argue. But rather, I want to address the political perspective of Tucker Carlson and him using this doctrine to support his incorrect political ideology. And honestly, I think it’s perfectly fine that I try to do that, because I believe I know more about this than Tucker Carlson. Just sayin’. ;-) Plus I absolutely believe what this is really about for Tucker, is only his politics. Let me make clear, I am not questioning or attacking Christians who hold to this view. Doctinal differences among Christians is a completely different issue than what I will discuss here.

Beginning Trouble with Tucker

Since leaving Fox News, Tucker has gained a tremendous number of followers that are considered “Groypers”. “Groypers” are an “alt-right” (that term is too nice) group that consists of mostly young people that were formed and named by Nick Fuentes. Fuentes is a well-known anti-Semite that was kicked out of the “Conservative Political Action Committee” (CPAC) for his radical, anti-Semitic statements. He then formed his own group called “America First Political Action Committee”, (AFPAC). He likes to identify himself and his group as “Christian” and/or “Christian Nationalists”. But “by their fruits you will know them.” I don’t see anything but rotten fruit. I can easily identify someone from this group in the comment section of Tucker’s posts on social media. None of them are quiet about their affiliations. I think that growing number is a concern. To me, that proves what ideology Tucker is promoting – they LOVE him and are in agreement with him.

Also, don’t be confused by their “America First” label; they are not “America First” in the way President Trump means. They are, in fact, basically not much different than what we used to identify as “neo-Nazis” – a far, far right radical, racist group that really mean “white only”. In fact, they are so far right, they reach the left. And in the correct definition, Hitler was not of the right, but rather the left. “National Socialists” was from where the term Nazi came. So it is not very hard to figure out where their ideology lies on “The Left – Right Political Spectrum”. Naturally, most of the people in this group are anti-Israel, whether they claim to be Christian or not! As far as the Groyper’s, people of other races are allowed and accepted in that group (as opposed to the neo-Nazis) ...just as long as they hate Israel. They wildly support this doctrine as is apparent in the comments on social media. These people identifying as “Groypers” give conservatives a bad name. They give a reason for ignorant liberals to identify all “conservatism” as “racist” when that couldn’t be further from the truth. That’s just another reason, they are so dangerous, in my view.

Now with that being said, I am not saying people that adhere to Replacement Theology, or this pastor align with. or support Groypers. I am saying there is a draw in Tucker’s messages that causes them to want to support him and they follow him faithfully. Therein lies a grave danger. They are gaining ground and credibility in the minds of those truly ignorant to what is taking place and love Tucker for all of his other accurate conservative positions, which of course he holds.

But here, I hope to demonstrate the inaccuracies with Tucker’s interview and the theology of Andrew Isker, which is indeed, “Replacement Theology”.

A Little Background

Tucker claims in the interview, that there are numerous times where Scripture erases the traditional view we believe, of God working differently through the dispensations. But I don’t think it’s wise to be taking our teaching from a political pundit who may or may not be a Christian. Certainly, in any case, we shouldn’t allow a new Christian, or a non-Christian to teach us the Bible; and there seems to be a lot of that going around these days. Politics is one thing and bringing God into it is perfectly acceptable. But to allow a political pundit to try to tell us what the Bible states (as if in a Bible Study) should be a huge no-no. And that is what I believe is happening on many fronts...Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Jordan Peterson, Russel Brand, just to name a few.

But back to the issue at hand. First, let’s define the name “Israel” according to Scripture. J. C. Ryle (1816-1900) in his book “Are You Ready for the End Time” explains the importance of defining terms before attempting an explanation. We can’t get to the correct end result, if from the beginning we don’t define what we are explaining so that people can understand correctly and all be on the same page.

Ryle points out there are 3 ways Israel is used/defined in the Bible.

1. Jacob, (father of the 12 tribes) whose name God changed to the name “Israel”.

2. The land defined with boundaries. This is the ten tribes that separate from the southern kingdom of Judah which had two tribes.

3. The entire Jewish race (the entire 12 tribes) who were scattered and brought back together as told and prophesied in Jeremiah 31:10.

"Hear the word of the Lord, you nations; proclaim it in distant coastlands: He who scattered Israel will gather them and will watch over his flock like a shepherd." 

Why do I even care about any of this? Scripture tells us multiple times that we are to bless Israel, and to pray for Jerusalem. In Genesis 12: 3, Numbers 24: 9 and Psalm 122:6, we are told that “those who bless Israel will be blessed. Those who curse Israel will be cursed.” Who wants to mess with that?? I certainly don’t. I want to bless Israel in my personal life and I want to be sure my church, and my nation continues to bless them.

Replacement Theology goes back as far as 160 AD and it has been debated since that time, too. I believe there has always been a waxing and a waning, where it grows stronger with many recurrences at different times in history. And there has always been a difference in theological views. It reportedly began out of a belief that from that time, the Jews had too much influence into the church and there was a desire that they be purged from Christianity. (How contrary is that?) These sentiments found their way into the hearts of the early church, ignoring the fact that the first church and the early church were obviously Jewish! Let’s get real! The church began at Antioch with Jews who knew those who had been discipled by Jesus – the earliest Christians were Jewish! The writers of the Bible were Jewish and they preserved the Scriptures for us! The disciples/apostles were Jewish; and the first missionaries were Jewish! And of course Jesus was Jewish!

But many who hold to the view of Supersessionism/Replacement Theology, also believed and blamed the Jew for crucifying Jesus, rather than understanding it was something that was always God’s plan. It was purely out of a lack of understanding that the Jews were blamed. These views became the basis for anti-Semitic teaching in many church circles. And in fact, are still around today. Those views ignored the fact that this was all entirely God’s plan, and that in a divine act of love God created a way for both the Jew and the Gentile to enter into His kingdom. I only point to this negative aspect as a means of how doctrine could have been misconstrued. Certainly though, many who hold to Replacement Theology are truly born again Christians who do not blame the Jew for the death of Jesus and they of course, understand the Gospel message completely. They simply hold to an allegorical view of the promise God gave to Israel.

In more recent years, Supersessionists now claim that Dispensationalism didn’t come about until the publishing of the Scofield Bible in 1909, which supposedly “promoted the inaccurate doctrine of Cyrus I. Scofield.” They also like to point to John Nelson Darby as a key figure in the development and disseminating of dispensationalism. The Scofield Bible did indeed come out in 1909 with a reprinting in 1917, but the commentary it gave, only supports what has been alive since the beginning of the first church... because, that view is Biblical. Dispensationalism was not created out of nothing, as accused; but rather it has always been, due to the tenets that were already present in Christian theological systems since the first church! It’s Biblical! Dispensationalism has been from the beginning of the church age! It IS the church age. Israel is God’s chosen people and God has not revoked that. Many people want to say that the belief of Israel as God’s chosen is new within the last couple hundred years. But that simply isn’t true. The truth is, there has never been a time in church history that this hasn’t been debated, so to claim this is only as recently as the Scofield Bible interpretation is simply not true. And in fact, Matthew Henry (1662-1714) spoke of Dispensationalism in the 1600’s. Matthew Henry stated in his commentary regarding Galatians 3:15-18:

“The covenant God made with Abraham, was not done away by the giving the law to Moses. The covenant was made with Abraham and his Seed. It is still in force; Christ abideth for ever in his person, and in his spiritual seed, those who are his by faith.”

Christians that adhere to Replacement Theology often use Galatians 3 for their source of affirmation. Galatians 3:29 is a main verse that is used. “And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.” While of course this is true, it is taken out of context to show Christians have superseded the covenant with Abraham. Certainly we are the offspring of Abraham. But nowhere does this imply that God has cast away, or is through with the Jewish people.

Supersessionists also use Galatians 3:7, 9, and 6:16, to support their belief in Replacement Theology; but to believe that, these verses must be taken out of context and interpreted allegorically as opposed to a literal translation. It is a means to make the promise God made to Abraham null and void, by implying God is done with the Jewish people. This couldn’t be further from the truth. “Eternal” means “eternal”. And “irrevocable” means “irrevocable”.

Though supersessionists may use Galatians to support their beliefs, Galatians 3:15, actually supports dispensationalism, showing that the Abrahamic Covenant was never revoked. Paul uses this example to show that a ratified covenant, even a human one, cannot be set aside or amended. Paul clearly states that God's covenant with Abraham remains in place even after the law was given through the time of Jesus, and through the church age.

Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

To believe that the church has replaced Israel, also negates one of the best witnessing tools we have; and that is Israel as God’s Time Clock. How can one look at the news headlines of today, and not see through what is happening in Israel, that God is in the center of all of it?

The truth is Replacement Theology actually fuels anti-Semitism as revealed in the words and actions of Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and others that I have mentioned. At the very least, if not anti-Semitic this view gives them allowance to campaign against our support for Israel. That is NOT President’s policy or belief. And I don’t care how hard Carlson tries to make us believe their views align.

While making sure this group tell us to read Galatians 3, they seem to ignore Romans 11 where it is made clear that we (the Christian) have been grafted into Israel. Through the fall of the Jewish people, salvation has come to the Gentiles. We have not replaced Israel, but we have been grafted into Israel. Romans 11:17

17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;

Romans 11 tells us that He has hardened the hearts of the Jew for their unbelief to give time to bring the Gentile to Him. Until the time of the fullness of the Gentile has come in. (been saved) All Israel will then be saved. Romans 11:26. And that is where understanding prophecy comes in to play. This does not mean that every Jew will be saved any more than every Christian will be saved. It depends and relies on a commitment to our Savior, Jesus Christ. These verses clearly depict the difference in the Jew and the Christian and tell us why and when – “until the full number of the gentile has come in.”

25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26 and in this way[e] all Israel will be saved. As it is written:“The deliverer will come from Zion; he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.

27 And this is my covenant with them when I take away their sins.”

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30 Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you. 32 For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.

God doesn’t forsake any promise because of our misbehavior. This clearly states the promise is irrevocable! He did not reject Israel for their sin, any more than he rejected us for our sin. He sent Grace – His Son. He knocks on our door and waits until we are ready and understand our need of Him. Why would he forsake his promise to Abraham and his descendants? “God forbid.” He wouldn’t. The answer is found in Romans 11:1-2 when Paul states:

I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew.

God is a promise keeper and He is not going to make void an “eternal” promise that He made to someone He identifies as His “chosen people” and the “apple of His eye”.

Our Father God made a permanent and irrevocable call to Israel that is separate from the call of Jesus to the church. That’s dispensationalism. But they work together in tandem. He hasn’t replaced Israel with the church. Instead he did away with the Jewish atonement system that He created until the time Jesus came to make a permanent atonement for our sins. When that is complete, he will return His attention to Israel.

Israel is still very much a part of His plan. In fact, we as the church are said we will provoke the Jew to jealousy, in order to help draw them to Jesus, their true Messiah.

11 I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy. 12 Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?

And not only does He wait for the moment of their salvation, He uses the nation of Israel as a witness and a “Time Clock” for the world to know the time is at hand. That’s powerful, when one views it in context! Read the headlines of today’s news, then follow along in Scripture. Israel is very much a part of God’s plan!

The Interview

In this interview, Tucker criticizes all of us for not reading Scripture, saying “the Bible tells us a thousand times that the church has replaced Israel.” That might be a paraphrase. But no. It does not! Obviously he is the one who needs a lesson in theology. Funny how he suddenly knows more than millions of Christians for generations! How arrogant!!! He simply does not have complete understanding and I believe he is relying on head knowledge from a group of people that choose to believe differently, rather than from “a circumcision of the heart” – that term from the Bible, purposely stated in language the Jew will understand. Intentionally...because they still matter!

They obviously don’t matter to Tucker and the myriad of people he has been hosting on his podcast. I am a bit worried about his influence and I am tired of what I believe to be his deception.

"For he is not a Jew, which is only outwardly; neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew which is inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God." Romans 2:28-29: 

“As regards the gospel, they are enemies for your sake. But as regards election, they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” ~ Romans 11:28

Matthew 5:18 states, "For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished". 

* Underlined emphasis, mine.