Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts

Friday, August 26, 2022

Robin Hood

So we have another new controversy coming from the Biden Administration. Big surprise there. When have we not had controversy in his 20 months as President?

President Biden wants to forgive the student debt of thousands upon thousands of people who took out a loan of their own volition with a commitment to pay it back. But instead, now Biden wants the rest of America to be the ones to pay it back. Nothing is ever really “free”. It’s going to cost someone something.

The left is trying to make Americans believe it’s only the right thing to do to offer a hand up from the government to those less fortunate….you know; kinda like Robin Hood. But the truth is, this isn’t the ways of the Hood. This is, in fact, just the opposite of our beloved Robin and instead places the burden on those who maybe couldn’t afford to go to college themselves; or who maybe worked two or three jobs in order to pay off the loan they had promised to pay. It's called responsibility and we used to honor that.

This most recent action by the President, in itself is bad enough; but even more, Joe Biden does not have the authority to do this. It is flat-out unconstitutional. The Executive Branch does not have the "Power of the Purse". Congress does. Seems democrats don’t care about that these days. Pelosi once understood it. We have her on tape saying it, just a short while ago.

But to me, most troublesome of all is now the Democrats will begin their “shame game”. We have come to know it well. It's a means to look like they are the righteous ones, "on the right side of history"(they love that phrase). They simply start shaming people for not being loving and caring if they disagree with their agenda.

They did the same thing with allowing illegal immigrants and the building of the wall. Who cares about the Rule of Law? “It is simply the Christian thing to do,” they lecture. Funny how they get religion when they find it necessary. They voted God out of their platform at their Democratic Convention in 2012. But call Him back to convince us He would NEVER approve of a wall. They probably should read Nehemiah.

Anyway, I am sure their goals all sound well and good. But the truth is, it is all a break down of the thing that holds our nation together and what has made it so successful for almost 250 years – the Constitution. The truth is, these are all very dangerous actions; not only for us, but for the world.

Both of these endeavors, in my opinion, are about the same thing. “Forgiving debt” is the same tactic as what they did to get their way at the border. “Let ‘em in!” Just forget all about our immigration laws, I guess. Why in the heck do you suppose they want all those people to have free reign? It’s because they think they will then vote "blue". It is my belief that in both of these cases the left is orchestrating/buying votes.

Democrats, these days, don’t seem to care about the Constitution in any form. Oh they love to refer to it in word, when they find it convenient; but they don’t really follow it...kind of in the same manner as when they talk about God or the Bible. They bring it up only when it makes them look righteous or caring. It’s an attempt to make the rest of us look like heathens. Truthfully, for myself, this is why I am most weary of, because I know the opposite is true.

The truth is, they are intent on destroying Capitalism in this nation; and instead ushering in Socialism. How can I say that? They are following the methodology piece by piece. Come on! Think about it. Hillary Clinton did her college thesis on Saul Alinsky. You know; author of the book “Rules for Radicals” dedicated to Lucifer. Yeah, that guy. Obama, too, was a staunch supporter and believer in all Alinsky taught. Obama was raised in a Communist home, after all. He hung out with the likes of Bill Ayers. Biden is simply Obama 2.0 with most of the same people still in power.

It is time Americans wake up to what is really going on in our nation. They can claim to be the caring ones all they want, but when one destroys Capitalism, one destroys the American Dream. When one destroys Capitalism, one destroys our nation’s ability to continue to be the most benevolent nation in the world. Our nation must be strong if we are ever to help the world. It is really that simple. And that goes for aiding other nations financially, defensively, or in sharing the Gospel. We must have a strong, rich nation in order to do any of that. You don't help anyone by printing more money, just to give it away and place the burden on everyone else. They are in effect causing inflation, not stopping it. I believe it is intentional destruction. EVERYTHING and I DO mean EVERYTHING this administration is doing is weakening the strength of our nation. It is time to ask ourselves why.

So Democrat, go ahead and pat yourself on the back. Go ahead and shame the rest of us for taking the stand we take. You were once the party of free speech and open ideas. That certainly cannot be said any longer as we see the crushing of free speech in all manner of ways. And the truth is, most cannot or will not even see the change in the party that has been wrought by those that have a desire for something else....you know – to "fundamentally transform America". Most of us liked America just the way she was.  Instead, many Democrats continue to stand up and look for a way to defend all that has been broken in the last 20 months. Instead, they should be rethinking it all and saying: “Hey wait a minute! The Constitution IS important. You can’t do that.”

The left instead wants to throw the book at President Trump for far lesser accusations without any proof at all. Even Democrat, Alan Dershowitz, has said the accusation of breaking the Espionage Act is ridiculous. Members of their own party have consistently done far worse things than President Trump. 30,000 emails destroyed? Phffff. Just make a joke out of it. That is always what Hillary has done when things go awry. The thing is, Hillary wasn’t President and she had no business declassifying anything and she certainly didn’t have the right to have those emails on her private server….but just mock those that complain about it, and it will all go away. That has pretty much worked for her, because we have conditioned people to be so sensitive and to be afraid to speak out about anything; so they remain silent at all of these unconstitutional actions. Yeah! About those emails. She can keep the t-shirt.

Seventy-one million votes for President Trump? Just call those voters “fascists”. Half of America was already convinced they were nothing but a “basket of deplorables” anyway. Yeah, no "deplorables" is not really a word, but Hillary said it, so it is now.

I really am trying to watch my sarcastic tone. But it isn’t easy. Things are going south fast in America. And no one seems to care. Or they aren’t paying attention. I do get it. The world isn’t an easy place right now. Life is difficult. People just want to be happy. But the thing is, we have stuck our head in the sand for way too long in efforts to be happy. That's how we got here in the first place. 

I kinda feel like those who are alive today and living in America are called to fight. I am not talking civil war...please don’t misinterpret the word. I am talking about fighting by paying attention, by voting, by speaking out,  writing and most of all praying...that kind of "fight". (Unnecessarily worried about misinterpretation? I don't think so. That is, in fact, exactly what they did to President Trump on January 6th- change the meaning of his words. That is their MO.) But the "fight" I mean is really all we need; and compared to what our ancestors did in the fight for liberty, our job is really pretty simple. 

Will we heed the call? Not looking too good if you ask me; but if we don’t do something, we most certainly won’t find happiness. Nor will our children and grandchildren. There really is no such thing as Robin Hood. God wouldn’t like his methodology. It’s contrary to everything He taught.


  • Exodus 20: 15
  • Nehemiah 6:3 (plus)
  • 2 Thessalonians 3:10



Wednesday, April 27, 2022

The Truth About Disinformation

If you have followed my blog for any length of time, then you know I have been concerned about the conspiracy theories spreading throughout social media. There have been some very well done videos with some pretty wild conspiracies, but often times they are simply a more subtle narrative. Even more often than these seemingly professional videos, there will be a lone speaker, in an amateur or self-made video, telling us his thoughts. These are still well-done with someone obviously knowing what they are doing. As well, sometimes a false, or questionable narrative has been spread through an interview by a “news source” or pod-cast. 

I have written about the deceptions at length, so I won’t reiterate that here. But if you have read my posts at all, then you know I have been trying to understand the timing, connections, and the why of these narratives.  

I think I finally figured it out just the other day, when I saw former President Barack Obama deliver a keynote address at Stanford University. His narrative was remarkable (not in a good way); his delivery consistent with his continual habit of lecturing us and talking down to us. His speech was all about "disinformation".

He was lecturing us on the “conspiracy theories” and fake news that according to him only occurs in conservative media. As if he is the one who should be lecturing anyone on honesty or false narratives! Good grief. Please think "You can keep your plan," as one example.


BUT. He is actually able to deliver this speech somewhat convincingly, due to those videos I have written about. These narratives weren't as much concern initially, because people weren’t really watching or buying. But that has recently changed. I believe this is due to the fear over the pandemic. More and more people began to buy into the conspiracies. The more one promoted it, the more others joined. They began to spread like wildfire.

Now, I am one who has always believed that though these videos targeted conservatives, and especially Christian conservatives, it was far from conservatives making and distributing them. I have a conspiracy of my own. I believe it is the left that is spreading these falsehoods, and targeting Christian conservatives as a means to “stir the masses” and subtly attack the psyche of those already living in a level of fear. It is then that people begin to believe it and spread the misinformation themselves.

Now before I get labeled as a “nut”, myself, why is that so hard to believe? It is the long-held goal of communism/socialism, via the left, to “stir the masses”. It is Saul Alinksy tactics promoted by the likes of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (both of whom have connections to Alinsky) who believe in these tactics and the ideals of “socialism” – the word "socialism", to be charitable. Fear and “stirring the masses” is a means to gain control. 

Think about it; though those in an effort to weaken America have used this tactic in recent times, it has actually been occurring since Biblical times, when Stephen, the martyr was arrested: Acts 6:12. “And they *stirred up the people*, and the elders, and the scribes, and came upon him, and caught him, and brought him to the council,”

These videos, once believed by conservatives, then get spread further, basically giving Obama the right to say some of what he said the other day in his disinformation speech. Because though Fox and other conservative news sources haven’t admitted these false narratives are out there, they really are becoming quite common. Instead, Fox and other media are simply pointing to Obama’s own lies, (as they should). But the fact is, there have been a barrage of false stories being spread by conservatives, albeit naively, and we shouldn't ignore that. We are enabling those who deceive. In truth, I think conservatives have been hood-winked. They are unwittingly joining the left by believing and sharing these falsehoods.

I believe this has all been intentional and by design. I believe the left is behind it, and most likely Barack Obama at the helm; or at least an active participant. Though you will be hard-pressed to find any information from search engines today about who said their goal was to “stir the masses” , (I think that is an intentional removal) it has been a well known tactic for generations. I tried to find the quote to source it; but the quote below, basically says the same thing about their goal. From the Alinksy plan: 
“[You must help]  the people in the community…feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. [An] organizer must shake up the prevailing patterns of their lives–agitate, create disenchantment and discontent with the current values, to produce, if not a passion for change, at least a passive, affirmative, non-challenging climate. [You must] fan the embers of hopelessness into a flame of fight.”
Now think about it. This false information has been making the rounds since the pandemic began. They have grown and grown, the narratives becoming more and more wild. I honestly believe, this "disinformation" is from the left and it was all planned for just this moment. In other words, so Obama could eventually come out and be the savior. These crazy conspiracies gave Obama the right to say exactly what he said at Stanford. It gives him a reason to attack conservatives, and point to all the misinformation they are spreading. 
Everything in Obama's speech becomes valid. I think that was the plan. But in fact, though some conservatives may have bought in, I firmly believe these false narratives and conspiracies are created by the left to make conservatives and especially Christian conservatives look like we have lost all common sense. 

Their plan is working. We are deceived. It is time for us to clean up our act and be more careful. It is time for us to be alert and to stand. We all need to be more careful and commit to discernment in what we choose to believe. If we lack discernment, we simply need to make a commitment to more carefully research everything we are told. It isn't that difficult. We simply need to be willing.

If something just doesn’t sound right, if our beliefs of old are challenged, dismissed, or criticized, we need to listen to the warning buzzer in our head and check out everything we are being fed.

The false narratives have a purpose. They have to be intentional. Why else would someone  be taking such great lengths to see that they continue? We need to determine who is behind them, and refuse to promote them. We must always look for and care about truth.




Monday, March 21, 2022

Connections Matter

Janice McGeachin, the Lieutenant Governor of Idaho, has continued to make waves and inflammatory news across the nation for her state and the governor of her state, Brad Little. She has fought him every step of her term, in pursuit of his job. She wants to be Idaho’s next governor.

Some of her antics have been downright foolish, catching the attention of news outlets from across the nation. For example, twice when Idaho’s governor left the state for a mere two or three days to attend an event out of state, McGeachin stepped in as acting governor. That is her duty as Lieutenant Governor, but she clearly overstepped when she created Executive Orders in his stead. The EO’s were contrary action to the way the governor felt the issues at hand should be handled. Little rescinded the EO’s upon his return. That was a waste of time and taxpayer money.

On another occasion while he was gone, she attempted to deploy the National Guard to the southern border. This, while Governor Brad Little was already at the border with eight other governors to discuss what solutions they might take to help with the border crisis. Yeah, that didn’t go well. She acted before she knew the correct procedure for such an action to take place. There needed to be a request from a border state to procure another state’s help. She had no authority to deploy the Guard. Janice quickly went silent on that one.

Anyway, there have been multiple issues, but you get the idea.   

I am sharing the video below, of an interview with Janice McGeachin and Stew Peters, NOT because I agree with it; but rather because I see so much wrong with it that I am simply astounded and now fuming. I don't think this kind of thing can be ignored. This is a classic example of "stirring the masses", and/or fear-mongering. But let me give you a little background of my concerns before we get to the video.

The rhetoric this guy (the interviewer – Stew Peters) uses in this interview is beyond excusable. The names he calls the cops, the judge and the hospital workers, actually anyone involved in this case is reprehensible. They are all evil in his mind and he doesn't hesitate to say it. I don't think I have ever seen anything so unfair and extreme.

But I shouldn't be surprised! Peters’ show airs on Nick Fuentes' streaming platform. You know Nick Fuentes the radical 23 year old that founded America First Political Action Committee (AFPAC). He was kicked out of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) as well as Turning Point, USA; reportedly due to his racist, anti-Semitic, and white supremacist views. He began AFPAC, he claims, as a "counterweight" to CPAC.

Now, let me be clear from the start. I am not saying McGeachin is a racist or a white supremacist. I know she says she is a supporter of Israel. That is kind of a no-brainer. One almost has to be pro-Israel to gain conservative support...especially in states like Idaho. But what I am saying, is she is being very foolish to align herself with these people. She often seems to act before she thinks. Not governor material, in my opinion.

McGeachin caught nationwide news media attention once again over a video she shared at AFPAC. She created a lot of discussion by even being involved there. People were understandably upset by her attendance via video. When questioned about it, at first she tried to say she didn't know who Fuentes was. You can watch her fumbling response in this video. Please take time to click on the link and view this short interview.

She seemed to be able to recover a bit from her fumbling when the reporter kept questioning her. But when her initial response didn't fly, she instead stated she shared her video at the questionable AFPAC to try to reach thousands of young people. Right. Like a six minute speech would influence anyone. The truth is when one joins something questionable in character or truth, one simply legitimizes the “bad apple” in question and justifies it to those who don’t know the truth. That is exactly what Janice McGeachin did with her video at AFPAC.

This woman is unable to express herself well in any interview I've ever seen her. She is like a Republican Kamala Harris, in my opinion. Babbling and inept. Trying to cover for the things she does not know. Listen to her with fresh ears and without bias. She says nothing of relevancy. Ever. Her entire campaign is nothing more than talking about masks and vaccines and attacks on Governor Brad Little. Truly! Where does she stand on other issues? Have we heard? Go to her campaign Facebook page and what you see is an attack on Brad Little almost every other post! Go to his page and you will find not one mention of any of his opponents.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And now we have this – a child endangerment case in Idaho. Interestingly, Stew Peters, the interviewer in the video below, spoke at AFPAC, too. If Janice was trying to distance herself from AFPAC (and she obviously was after the controversy that resulted from her speech) then she should never have done this interview with someone so connected to Fuentes and who is making the types of accusations that he is making. And let’s not miss an important point from the video. Even though she says she "shouldn’t be identified or connected with whom she shares a stage", (paraphrase) a few weeks later we find out SHE is the one who contacted Peters for this interview. Peters says in the video that McGeachin contacted HIM. Apparently she didn’t learn anything from her associations at AFPAC that quickly went south. Or, she simply doesn’t care.

As an aside, but important because I believe we should be careful with our associations: Nick Fuentes and Stew Peters are both aligned with Lin Wood...you know Lin, the guy who was a former staunch Democrat in GA, but just in time changed parties to come out as a “Trump Republican”. He’s the one who told all Republicans in GA to stay home and not vote in the crucial Senatorial race in Georgia after the debacle of the General Election. Like staying home would solve anything! Lin Wood is out to destroy the Republican party, in my opinion. And it is my view, that he helped destroy President Trump. And now once again, Janice is making a connection with Fuentes, through Peters who is aligned with Lin Wood. This, after trying to get herself out of another association with Fuentes. Does she think? Connections matter!! Her “at all costs” quest for governor is taking her places, she simply should not go.

Side note: Stew Peters is so extreme, even Fuentes had to reprimand him for comments he made at AFPAC.

This is the recent video of the interview between Stew Peters and Janice McGeachin regarding child endangerment in Idaho. Do yourself a favor and skip to the three minute mark to save some time by avoiding the long intro. The interview ends at twenty minutes.

Or you can view it at the link below on Facebook.

https://www.facebook.com/bramige.banks/videos/1030216167581058/

Janice, with this video, is up to her continual, same old antics of politicizing and blaming Idaho's governor for things he doesn't even have means to control. She should know the governor cannot take steps into a private citizen's health. HIPPA applies to the governor too! Thank God! We do not want government involved in our health issues! While continually claiming to be the conservative candidate, she continually takes stances or endorses actions that are far from conservative. The governor should not intervene in private medical matters. Once again, that is something that would set a terrible precedent – as would her previous Executive Orders if they had been allowed to stand. Certainly Governor Little shouldn’t have intervened in the Baby Cyrus case (as this has come to be known) this early on. The situation resolved itself. The baby is already home. I thank God for that.

She acts like she thinks the governor can be some kind of dictator or something that has any power he might desire. She is attributing actions to the governor that he simply cannot take. Once again revealing her naivete for the task at hand – just as she did in her attempt to deploy the National Guard. It would be abusing his authority for the governor to intervene in a child custody case at that early point in time.

She is once again politicizing for her own gain. She's using this child to bash Brad Little once again! And again without having facts on her side. And that she condones Stew Peters heated rhetoric in this video is just as reprehensible as if she stated it herself. His language is so far out of line, and his later comment that he is not accusing anyone doesn’t negate the accusations he had already made throughout the video. He placed a thought in the minds of the viewer, and then he tried to retract it to protect himself from law suits. McGeachin did the same thing. Peters denies making accusations after he clearly did. And then he does it again! How blind does he think we are? 

He casts blame on the governor, the judges, the "corrupt cops" and the “psychopath doctors”. They are instilling fear and stirring the masses. Somewhere along the line this whole fiasco actually enabled the doxxing of not only this baby, but as well, law enforcement, social workers and medical workers were exposed. This, endangering the lives and livelihood of these people who were merely doing their jobs. That is not OK. When are we going to get tired of that type of behavior! Fuentes also ran the names in this interview with Janice, and included photos of people who were required to be involved with the case due to their job! I bet they would prefer to not have to be involved at all with something like this.

Isn't anyone else sick of these types of antics? This is all I have seen this woman do! I am so frustrated with it! This interview was not news; nor is it factual. It's opinionated, vile commentary. And this interview was actually taking place even as the baby had already been returned to his parents!

It seems they have not clue one about the baby’s return to his parents. Or if they did know, it appears to me they wanted to go ahead with their propaganda anyway in hopes that nobody would realize the baby was already home. I saw posts about the baby's return before I saw this interview...and the "time stamp" (for lack of better term) of the interview was after the baby was already home! They had to know, in my view.

Stew Peters even had to lead her through a point he was trying to make because she wasn't aware enough to catch it the first time around. And that is this: Peters was trying to say they were passing the baby off to a foster parent. I don't believe this to be true. I had just read info about what the hospital was saying as far as the baby's improvement and it was nothing about going to a foster parent. They were preparing the baby to go home the day before this interview. They may have had a foster parent lined up just in case it was necessary – covering all bases, as they should. But Peters said it anyway and the way he presented it, it seems they were trying to lead us to believe something that wasn't true. The baby went home the same day as this interview, not to a foster.

But even so, my point is this: Janice McGeachin wasn't even aware enough to catch on to what the interviewer was trying to lead her into saying. And yes. He WAS leading her. She missed it initially. And that is this: that if the baby could go to foster care then he could have been able to go home. Yes, duh! But there was no foster care. She missed the whole point of Stew Peters! When she finally caught on to his point, (one can literally see the light go on in her facial expression) she simply reiterated it, without offering any solutions or explanations, had it been true.

Throughout the video the two manage to get buzz words in that will inflame the viewer. They manage to sneak in an attempt to make it look like "the kidnapping" may have had something to do with the vaccine, because they know that will draw the ire of conservatives and be an attention grabber. But it didn't have to do with vaccines. The baby wasn’t taken due to a refusal to vaccinate. Nor does it seem vaccinations were even mentioned by CPS. The experts were concerned with malnutrition. Now the family was concerned they may force vaccinate the baby while he was at the hospital. But that fear was unfounded, in my opinion. Idaho does not have forced vaccinations. Especially forced vaccination of babies! No one in Idaho is forced to vaccinate their child in any form.

In the interview, McGeachin seemingly can’t wait to move in again with attacks on Governor Little, without any representation of facts. She even states that Christian pastor, Diego Rodrigues, (the well-known grandfather) didn’t mention Governor Little in his list of those he blames. But she sure did!! And she couldn't wait to do it as they ran the names and photos of those they blame in the background.  

Apparently Rodrigues did say however, that he thought the state is engaged in a child trafficking ring and equated it to trafficking at the border. This is so far out of line to me, it does nothing for his cause. This was ONE incident in which they may have errored. Come on. How much does this happen in Idaho? In a way, what he said with equating it to human trafficking at the border simply belittles what is actually happening at the border. That is a tragedy. And it belittles cases where CPS actually is needed. This is the rhetoric that enflames; and it has to stop.

Some questions I have from the video: The grandfather himself also said the state determined it was unsafe for the baby to go to foster, but then everything is twisted to make it sound like the baby was appointed to foster. He talks about the next press conference being canceled. But was the press conference canceled because they knew the baby was going home and perhaps they didn’t want that information released yet? Or did the family cancel the press conference? There are so many questions that simply don’t make sense. And these two seem to be trying to capitalize on this whole story. Janice is right about one thing. The communication is horrible. And I believe that is in large part due to people trying to make a political issue out of it and bolster attention for themselves.

There were several terrible accusations in the video. Janice was quick to say, “I will be looking into whether there was money involved.” But will she? What kind of an accusation is that!? In their sly, careful way, they have accused the state and specifically Governor Little of profiteering and then they quickly cover for themselves to say they are accusing no one.

The fact that the interviewer simply quoted, rather “paraphrased” a comment from Facebook from someone who claimed to have worked for CPS is not very professional – to be kind. I have worse suspicions than merely unprofessional. Peters didn’t even know if the amount of money that was stated in the comment was millions of dollars or billions. This certainly doesn’t support anything! It’s FACEBOOK...who even knows if the person that wrote the comment was whom they claimed to be. It is astounding he would use this comment and treat it as “fact”, instead of researching anything for himself. Think about that, please. He stated a random comment from Facebook as if it were fact - from someone he doesn't even know.

But let’s get to the heart of McGeachin’s attacks. Does the governor have the authority to be the one to instruct who will provide shelter care? This is a link from the state of Idaho that explains the procedure for shelter care in Idaho. This was the procedure that was followed. The baby was away from his mother and in the hospital for a total of six days. Yes, that is too long. Yes, it is heartbreaking this happened. But do we really know it wasn’t necessary? 

Peters and McGeachin claim this was done “outside of the legal process”. They claim that because the governor didn’t intervene that “makes him complicit”. And as I stated earlier, along with Rodrigues, Peters also equates it to child trafficking at the border. The fact that he implies Little and others are profiteering is actually shocking. So of course Peters then states he is “not going to make that allegation either”...that’s lawsuit material. But, in truth, he just did! And then he reiterated his accusations toward the end of the video. This seems to be the way of so many of these videos that seem only to want to “stir the masses”. The MO they always seem to use instilling a thought and then denying it in order to protect themselves from law suits. But they have already placed it in to the minds of the viewer. I have written about that before. Too little, too late to deny it.

It is my thought that Stew Peters and Janice McGeachin were simply trying to "stir the masses" with this interview. They were misleading viewers and instilling anger; the rhetoric is so far beyond the pale blaming the Governor for human trafficking! Good grief!! And she wonders why he doesn't return her calls! It isn’t in her authority to do anything! Why should he call her?? He did have his attorney return her call. Good grief! After everything she has done, if I were Governor Little, I would only respond to her through my attorney too!!

People better wake up because this is a tragedy! And yes it's frightening and sad that a baby may have been taken from his parents but what these people are doing is equally as frightening. Yes, there were stipulations put on the parents that they must follow in order for the baby to go home. I am not arguing if that is right or wrong. I am not arguing the case for what happened with this family one way or the other. I think it is terribly sad; but I really do not have all the facts. Nor do any of us. I am only pointing out that Janice, once again, is using something to bash Brad Little with facts that are simply inaccurate and her rhetoric seems to be heating up further from what it already was.

McGeachin, at the end of the video, takes credit for the fact that she is simply trying once again to faithfully fight another battle against the Governor of Idaho. Supposedly it’s another call from the Lt. Governor, trying to clean up where Governor Little won’t. Ever the heroine, at least that is how she wants to be perceived. The truth is she is inserting herself where she doesn’t belong once again, making it look like she has power she most certainly doesn’t have. Distorting truth to make it look like only she is the one who actually cares, but Little is only out for himself. I believe the opposite is true and I am sickened by her constant badgering and attacks. Ever the heroine? No. Ever the campaigner!

One more minor thing. This video was shared by someone from New York??? About Idaho? What’s really going on? My suspicions over everything she has done is heightened.

I have tried to break down the fallacies in this video one by one. Honestly, I am starting to wonder if McGeachin isn't herself a paid agitator by the left. Truly! Who acts like this??? It is such a shame. Connections indeed matter. And her connections make me wonder even more about her and her agenda.

In all seriousness, she may very well be a good person. She may have the best of intentions. But in my view, she has demonstrated a lack of wisdom, a careless disregard for authority and her position, as well as the position of the governor; and an absolute quest to bring the attention to herself for campaign reasons. One thing I know, she needs to be careful with her connections and with whom she aligns... and she needs to learn to finish her sentences. We don't need a Republican Kamala Harris.

Finally, thank GOD this baby has returned home! And truthfully I don’t think Janice, or even all the protests/rallies had anything at all to do with it. The system simply worked it’s way through the proper procedures.

Hopefully the proper procedures will work in November, too.


*Edited for clarity on April 17, 2022.