In the past year, we have seen some dramatic changes in the way we live our lives. Most of us have never lived through a dangerous pandemic. Certainly not one of this degree; and for those who have, they most assuredly have never seen it handled in the way this one has been handled. In the past, it was the sick who were quarantined, not the well. It’s that simple. But anyway, as we are settling into the end of this catastrophe, we are better able to look at some of the consequences from it.
One of the things we are seeing, which I feel we could have never anticipated, is a mass exodus of citizens from “blue states” to “red states”. This escape has increased exponentially since COVID-19 brought about the restrictive nature of states that are run by Democrats. As well, I believe the break down of Law Enforcement in "blue states" is an important reason many are choosing to leave the areas they once called home, and search for better ground.
What are some of the repercussions of this exodus? We all know there are many consequences - most of them extremely detrimental to the states receiving the influx of people.
With people fleeing blue states, the massive increase in population isn’t just happening in a few conservative states. We tend to feel this is all about us and our home state, but this is occurring all across the US – Florida, Texas, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, etc. are some of the conservative states receiving a huge influx of people. With this happening, it is increasing prices of property value and in many cases, pricing locals out of the market. In my home state, where the living wage is much lower than anywhere people are coming from, locals are worried about property taxes going up so high that they will be taxed completely out of their homes. Young families will never be able to afford to buy a home or property.
But my question for this post is this: Who is buying up the properties in these blue states that allows the flight to continue? I mean think about it. If people are leaving these blue states, who in the world is staying behind and buying up the properties at the prices they are being sold??? I have heard big corporations are purchasing land and homes and turning properties into strictly rentals. I think that is probably a part of it. But what if there is a more sinister agenda? What if the goal is to diminish property ownership in America? What better way, to turn everything into a rental. To drive prices so high, most people can’t afford to buy. But more importantly to just not let them, by only offering rentals. If that happens, then we have lost something to cling to, to fight for, to believe in – and that is...our home. What if there is no home?
I will get right to my point. What if it is the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) who is the one buying up properties in blue states, allowing citizens to leave the destruction that has come to their home states and also create destruction to the states they are going. Truly, we are finding the CCP is behind everything else! What if this is just a furtherance of their agenda? Or maybe it is simply those pushing the Karl Marx agenda right here in America, by other Americans. We know that is happening now too - specifically through Critical Race Theory as one example; but that is for another post. I want to talk about Communism, via Marxism.
Now for some, my comments about Communism, which I am about to embark on, may seem elementary or a "no brainer"; especially regarding the goals of communism when it comes to private property. We all know communism is about preventing Capitalism by limiting private property. Our Founders understood the importance of private property and keeping it our own, without interference from government. It is in effect, the "American Dream". But let’s take a look at the Communist Manifesto and the communists' plan, because what is happening in America right now, all seems to fit into their stated agenda.
For this post, I am going to only deal with those things laid out in the Communist agenda that involve private property. But as background and for reference, I will start with the basic well-known “10 Planks of Communism”. These are easily googled and found on many sites.
Karl Marx's "10 Planks" of the Communist Manifesto:
- Total abolition of private property
- Heavy income tax on everyone
- Elimination of rights of inheritance
- Property rights confiscation
- Central banking system
- Government ownership of transportation and communication vehicles
- Government ownership of agricultural means and factories
- Government controlled labor
- Regional planning – there should be no distinction between city and rural
- Government controlled education
As you can see almost all of these planks revolve around the effort to destroy private property. Below are just a few other concerns from the manifesto which can be found in its entirety - again, in PDF format here:
The same will be true of agriculture, which also suffers from the pressure of private property and is held back by the division of privately owned land into small parcels. [Really???]
A corollary of this is that the difference between city and country is destined to disappear. [They want to see an end to cities and country, but for it all to blend as one.]
There is an interesting statement of faith in this document - at the end of the PDF. It simplifies in “question and answer” form that which is written in the Manifesto. And again, for this post, I have only highlighted what involves property rights. Also, please remember when you read this, this was written in 1847. It is an agenda to make Communism look good – to appear as if it is for the GOOD of the people. We all know better.
“A Communist Confession of Faith” From the Communist Manifesto:
Question 1: Are you a Communist?
Answer: Yes.
Question 2: What is the aim of the Communists?
Answer: To organise [sic] society in such a way that every member of it can develop and use all his capabilities and powers in complete freedom and without thereby infringing the basic conditions of this society. [The Big Lie]
Question 3: How do you wish to achieve this aim?
Answer: By the elimination of private property and its replacement by community of property.
Question 16: Will it be possible for private property to be abolished at one stroke?
Answer: No, no more than existing forces of production can at one stroke be multiplied to the extent necessary for the creation of a communal society. In all probability, the proletarian revolution will transform existing society gradually and will be able to abolish private property only when the means of production are available in sufficient quantity.
Question 18: How will you do this?
Answer: I. By limiting private property in such a way that it gradually prepares the way for its transformation into social property, e. g., by progressive taxation, limitation of the right of inheritance in favour of the state, etc., etc. II. By employing workers in national workshops and factories and on national estates. III. By educating all children at the expense of the state. (bold emphasis, mine)
Question 20: What will be the consequences of the ultimate disappearance of private property?
Answer: Society will take all forces of production and means of commerce, as well as the exchange and distribution of products, out of the hands of private capitalists and will manage them in accordance with a plan based on the availability of resources and the needs of the whole society. In this way, most important of all, the evil consequences which are now associated with the conduct of big industry will be abolished.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So there you have it. And I know I keep saying that I will only deal with private property in this post, but there is one more thing I want to mention that is imperative to the Communist agenda, (and incredibly important to me) so I will include it here:
Question 23: What will be its attitude to existing religions?
Answer: All religions so far have been the expression of historical stages of development of individual peoples or groups of peoples. But communism is the stage of historical development which makes all existing religions superfluous and brings about their disappearance.9 (emphasis in bold, mine)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I will lose most people if I try to delve into every aspect of communism’s goals. But everyone should read this manifesto - Especially the question and answer section which I have only included in part with this post. Please follow the link here: A Communist Confession of Faith
When taken into context, all of this explains very well why we are seeing what we are seeing take place in our society today. For example, this explains why we are seeing the degradation of women through destroying differences in genders. It explains why religion must be destroyed. It explains why taking control of public education is critical; and of course it explains why destroying private property is central to it all.
Some will find me too conspiracy minded for their liking. But I think this is something we need to remember and to contemplate. Nothing is done overnight, but rather incrementally. That truth is even noted in the Manifesto. Step by step, with patience and time. Regardless if this is a plot by the CCP as my theory suggests, or for whatever reason this is happening in America, it is still resulting in the Communists’ desired outcome. And that is, to control the masses by controlling private property – the most essential property being people’s homes. Who's going to fight for what they don't own?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A small glossary of terms you may come across as you read the manifesto:
Capitalism: An economic system characterized by freedom of the market in which individuals and/or corporations own land and means of production and distribution that are operated for profit.
Socialism: A system or theory of social organizations in which the producers or the state's possess both political power and production and distribution means I.E. ownership of land, industry and capital. Communism is the end result of socialism.
Communism: A system characterized by the absence of social classes and by common ownership of production means [That’s the polite, Webster definition – we know the end result]
Bourgeois: The middle-class/upper-class, or the owners of land and means of production. In Marxist theory, the capitalist class. [Hypocrisy much]
Proletariat: The working-class; the class of industrial wage earners.
Bolsheviks/Bolshevists: Russian word for "majority." Also, a member of the political party that seized power and set up a proletarian dictatorship in Russia – effectively introducing communism.
Czar: For this purpose, one in authority; leader. [Interesting to note, Democrats love this term.]
No comments:
Post a Comment